M (1931) is a German thriller
that was created just after the technological union of sound and film. Thus, as
a sound film, M had room for opportunity and innovation movies before it did not
have. The sound in this film plays an important role in that it not only makes
things more realistic, it makes the interaction within more human and palpable
for the audience. In addition, important consequences arise from the presence
of sound in the narrative. The drama and emotion conveyed are heightened in
comparison to silent films which largely relied on exaggerated facial
expressions to express emotions and title cards to continue forward the
narrative.
A
prime example of this new use of sound in M is within the editing and use of a
voice overlay called a sound bridge. There is a shot showing people in the
streets crowding around the news bulletin of the recently discovered murder of
a child. Paranoia was clearly ever increasing. One man in the crowd said
"you in front, read it out loud!" from which a voice began to read
the flyer. A voice which one would assume to be that of a person in the crowd.
The voice stops and someone even yells "Louder, we can't hear a word"
something which further implies the voice emanates from a man within the crowd.
The shot stays on the crowd while the voice begins reading and then suddenly
switches over to a shot of several men smoking and drinking at a table with one
of them reading the same news from the paper. The voice was that of the man
sitting at the table throughout. This is certainly an innovative use of sound
and editing. This scene really gives a sense of the large scale paranoia and
fear the murderer has induced in every citizen throughout the city while also
showing a smaller scale discussion and argument of the matter, relaying to the audience the absolute feeling of contempt everybody feels for the
murderer. Therefore, as well as having innovative sound use, this scene
serves two very important roles of imparting the feelings of citizens onto the audience in addition to continuing forward the narrative in an efficient
manner.
Another
interesting facet of this new usable technology in film is one of
contrast. Sound is now an additional option, thus the lack of sound
(silence in film, which earlier been thoroughly explored) can
add intriguing effects. A definitive example of this is the scene
where the mother's daughter has gone missing. She yells her daughters name
while searching for her, giving a certain sense of helplessness and
terror. Then suddenly the shot cuts to the chair where she usually sits to eat
now empty, and then shows her ball rolling down a slope, and then her balloon
flying away and becoming entangled in power lines. There is not one bit of
sound during this set of shots. The silence gives a feeling of something
missing, of something being not right. Therefore the lack of sound in this case
serves to reinforce the atmosphere and sense of the wrongdoing taking place.
Hence, sound serves as an additional dimension with room for contrast and
more possibilities.
Furthermore,
sound is what leads to the ultimate demise of the antagonist. The
recognition of his distinctive whistling song "In the Hall of
the Mountain King" (the first use of leitmotif in a movie which is used to
indicate the presence of the character) by the blind balloon salesman
really plays to the fact that sound adds an additional layer to both the film
and the narrative.
The
ending of the film is quite perplexing aspect and leaves room for imagination.
It ends rather abruptly does not give a sense of closure. It almost
seems in a way a forceful attempt to add a moral or message into the movie. The
apparent sorrow of the victims' mothers and their words of self-guilt serves to fuel the disdain the audience has for the murderer even
further. A verdict is not given which causes one to wonder what degree of justice
has been served (given the relatively inept police force) in relation to
the thieves "kangaroo court".
No comments:
Post a Comment